14 ■ COMMUNITY PRACTICE: PURPOSE AND KNOWLEDGE BASE
The relationships among community/organizational issues, goals,
objectives, inputs, outcome evaluation/documentation, and reflection, with an emphasis
on the value framework of sustainable development.
Community Vision—the dream of how we want
the community to look in the future, including
community economic development, environmental
conservation, and social equity and justice
did we accomplish? WhatGoal or Goals—WhatReflection—
What did we learn will be accomplished
from these actions?
Objectives—Specific ways we
want changes to happen
Evaluation of
Impact—
Indicators and Inputs—What we have and can invest in
methods to activities toward our objectives
measure change
in community Evaluation of
social, Outcomes—Indicators and Outputs—Activities,
economic, and methods to measure the projects, and programs we
environmental
conditions over plan and carry out to reachresults of what we did or did
time social, economic, and workshops, meetings,our objectives (e.g.,not do toward changing
environmental conditions in events, training, actions,
our community recruitment, testifying at
Short Term: how people’s public hearings, holding
knowledge, awareness, press conferences, etc.)
attitudes, skills, aspirations,
and motivations changed
Medium Term: how people’s
decisions, conditions,
actions, advocacy efforts,
and policies changed
FIGURE 1.2 Continuous Sustainable Community Development
Model adapted from R. Arnold, R., Burke, B., James, C., Martin, D., and Thomas, B. (1991), Educating
for a Change (Toronto, Ontario: Between the Lines/Doris Marshall Institute for Education and Action);
Paul Castelloe and Dorothy N. Gamble (2005), “Participatory Methods in Community Practice: Popu-
lar Education and Participatory Rural Appraisal,” in The Handbook of Community Practice, ed. Marie
Weil (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications); Paolo Freire (1974), Education for Critical Conscious-
ness (New York: Continuum).
Source: Dorothy N. Gamble, Marie Weil, N. Kiefer, and Resourceful Community Members (2005), Mea sur ing
a Movement: Evaluating Outcomes in Community Sustainable Development (Chapel Hill, NC: The Resourceful
Communities Program of The Conservation Fund), p. 5. Used with permission from The Conservation Fund.
Environment and Development 1987). Although traditional wisdom suggested
that market- based economic development was the single most important way to
decrease poverty and increase opportunities, such narrowly focused efforts of-
ten came at the cost of the depletion of fi nite resources, lasting environmental
damage, extreme gaps between wealthy and poor populations, and rapid extinc-
tion of plant and animal species (Daly and Cobb 1989; Escobar 1995; Korten
2001; Prigoff 2000). The movement promoting sustainable development