O U R H U M A N WO R L D
If we can get our city lives right—especially our buildings and our
transportation—we will be well on the way to meeting the challenge of
environmental sustainability. More than ever, cities are where the people
are, so sustainability efforts must focus on urban areas. Cities also offer
efficiencies of scale, meaning that urban initiatives are likely to offer higher
payback over shorter periods for investments in green buildings and more
energy-efficient transit. “Better cities means resolving issues of housing,
density, technology, infrastructure and aesthetics,” says Bruno Lafont, the
chairman and CEO of the world’s largest cement company, the Lafarge
Group, whose future depends on the growth of cities in Asia. For custom-
ers in countries like China and India, cost matters in a way that it does not
for the rich world, where people have the money to pay a premium for
more environmentally benign products. Lafarge and other leading cement
and building materials companies cannot ignore the reality that they are
competing in extremely price-sensitive markets, but they simultaneously
are trying to take into account the long-term impact their products have on
the environment and society. “How can we reduce the cost of construction
when we take into account the life cycle of the building and not just the
cost of construction?” asks Lafont. “On sustainability, how do we reduce
the environmental footprint of the cities?”2
These are important questions—and maddeningly complex ones.
Think of energy use as a three-legged stool. One leg of the stool is build-
ings; the energy used to heat, light, and cool buildings accounts for about
one third of our total energy consumption. The second leg of the stool is
transportation, with cars, trains, trucks, buses, and planes accounting for
roughly one third more. The third leg of the stool is manufacturing, min-
ing, and construction. Cities obviously figure prominently in the first two
legs, but they are important for this final leg, too. Coal mining uses sig-
nificant energy; coal in turn is largely used to generate electricity, most of
which is used by city dwellers. More efficient buildings reduce the need for
coal-fired power plants, and designing buildings to incorporate efficiencies
and lengthen their useful lives cuts down on energy use by the construc-
tion sector. Each leg of the stool, in other words, affects the others, and the
energy-saving opportunities available in a virtuous circle of more efficient
buildings, transport, and city design are enormous. But this feedback cycle
can work in the opposite direction as well, and large parts of Asia suffer
from a vicious circle of inefficient buildings, transportation, and cities.
Asia also has a handful of exemplary cities that are consciously using
their density as an advantage in ensuring an environment that is more