preface
We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad
morals; we know now that it is bad economics.
—Franklin Delano Roosevelt, January 20, 1937
Are principled behavior and profitable behavior intrinsically in conflict,
or can corporations do well and also do good? Newspaper headlines sug-
gest a conflict—we see stories of mortgage companies enriching themselves
by predatory lending to poor families, defense contractors entering into
improper relationships with defense department officials, coal companies
and automobile companies lobbying aggressively to allow continued emis-
sions of greenhouse gases, and investment banks and rating agencies pack-
aging junk bonds as high-quality debt. These examples all suggest that
businesses have found it necessary to behave in an unprincipled fashion to
make money. The headlines, however, give only part of the story: what you
can easily miss is that some of the worst predatory lenders are now bank-
rupt, the defense contractor executives responsible for improper relation-
ships with the defense department have been fired and the company fined,
and many of the investment bankers responsible for the excesses of the
structured finance binge of 2006 and 2007 will have lost their jobs by the
time this book is in print. True, the auto companies and coal companies are
still lobbying aggressively—but almost as if to spite them the world’s most
valuable and profitable car company is Toyota, which has positioned itself
as the green car company par excellence. Perhaps the headlines are mislead-
ing; perhaps there is a cost to antisocial corporate behavior that is felt on a
slightly longer timescale than the apparent gains. And of course headlines
are notoriously biased—they only tell us what is deemed newsworthy, and
good behavior is rarely as newsworthy as bad. So we don’t see headlines
telling us that for the last decade BP has been reducing its greenhouse gas
emissions voluntarily, that Starbucks works to reduce the environmental